If Congress enacts them into law, the legislative concepts outlined in President Biden’s first budget will have far-reaching effects on American debt, deficits, and taxation. One specific policy may have an effect even as a proposal. By suggesting a repeal of the Hyde Amendment, the president gave conservative states another reason not to expand Medicaid.
While coverage of the Biden budget has focused on its support of taxpayer funding for abortion, fewer articles have analyzed where that funding would occur. In practice, eliminating the Hyde Amendment would mean states that have embraced Medicaid expansion would find themselves on the vanguard of a major expansion of abortion coverage. The states that have yet to expand Medicaid—all of which have pro-life tendencies—should take note.
Additional Cash in COVID Spending Spree
Biden has offered new incentives for the 12 states who have yet to embrace Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid to the able-bodied. Under the aegis of “COVID relief,” Section 9814 of Democrats’ economic legislation offers states that had not expanded as of its March date of enactment a two-year, 5 percent increase in the federal match for their existing Medicaid populations.
Democrats hope that the combination of a temporary increased federal match for current beneficiaries, coupled with a 90 percent enhanced federal match for the new populations covered by Obamacare, would entice the remaining states to take up expansion.
Cutting Hyde Means Forcing States to Cover Abortion
But the administration’s proposal to repeal the Hyde Amendment would have the opposite effect. First enacted in 1976 and named for the late pro-life Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Illinois, the amendment prohibits all federal funds, including Medicaid matching dollars, from being used for abortions, except in the cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.
Because the Hyde Amendment occurs as a rider to Congress’ annual appropriations bills, lawmakers must re-enact the measure every year. Biden’s budget proposed eliminating the rider for next year’s appropriations measure, in which case the pro-life protections would lapse.
If Congress follows the president’s lead and does not renew the Hyde Amendment, court precedents may require state Medicaid
Continue reading on thefederalist