75.8 F
College Station
Friday, July 30, 2021

The Supreme Court’s Bostock Ruling Opened A Can Of Worms For Title IX And Girls’ Sports

Local News

College Station Bans Traditional Pet Shops

At Thursday's meeting, the College Station city council passed an ordinance that prohibits the sale of non-rescue dogs and cats in pet...

College Station to Vote on ROO in Special Meeting Today

The College Station City Council meets Monday at 4 p.m. at city hall to consider a Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). The ordinance would allow single-family...

College Station Plans on Borrowing Additional $62 Million Without Taxpayer Vote

The College Station City Council voted to begin the process of issuing $62 million in certificates of obligations for capital projects. The...

Brazos Valley Hospitalizations Continue to Decline After Mask Order Rescinded

Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued Executive Order GA-34 on March 2, 2021, and the order went into effect on March 10, 2021....

Several months ago, Chelsea Mitchell, an award-winning athlete from Connecticut, wrote a powerful letter in which she expressed the difficulties and struggles that she endured when having to compete in track-and-field events against boys. Mitchell lost numerous state championship titles, as well as other opportunities.

Sadly, Mitchell is not the only athlete who has been unfairly disadvantaged and hurt by  policies permitting transgender males to compete against females in athletic competitions. However, while the unfairness associated with such policies is glaringly obvious, the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia created a dilemma that needs to be clarified. Specifically, at some point, the Supreme Court will need to address whether, and to what extent, its decision and reasoning in Bostock applies in the context of school sports and Title IX.

In Bostock, the Supreme Court issued a single opinion involving several cases alleging discrimination against various employees. As reported by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission:

Gerald Bostock, a child welfare services coordinator, was fired after his employer learned he had joined a gay softball league. Donald Zarda, a skydiving instructor, was fired after his employer learned he was gay. In a case filed by the EEOC, funeral director Aimee Stephens was fired after her employer learned that she was going to transition from male to female.

As a result, the Supreme Court was asked to decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender pursuant to Title VII.

In response to this important inquiry, the Supreme Court ruled that the term “sex” includes a person’s “gender identity” in cases of discrimination pursuant to Title VII. As reported in The National Law Review, the Bostock court held that “Title VII’s prohibition against ‘sex discrimination’ includes a prohibition against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”

In other words, since Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex (among other things), it also protects against discrimination based on “gender identity,” which the court ruled falls under the umbrella of the term “sex,” as used in

Continue reading on thefederalist

More articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

State News

Fighting Honorably, In Context

As the saying goes, “Context is king.” Nowhere have I seen that so practically displayed as in Israel, where passages from the Bible spring...

Abbott’s Border Fence

Brandon is joined by Michael Sullivan to talk about the current events in the Texas House and Robert Montoya comes on to talk about...

Fighting Honorably

Righteous ends don’t justify dishonorable means. In this week’s podcast, Michael Quinn Sullivan talks about being in the cave where David decided to spare...

Texas Governor, Lawmakers Continue to Do Nothing to Protect Children From Mutilation Operations

AUSTIN — While Gov. Greg Abbott and representatives point fingers and talk in circles, they still have taken no action to actually stop medical...

Texas’ Debt Obligations Have State Headed for Hard Financial Times

Because of irresponsible spending practices by elected officials, Texas is $97 billion in debt. Texans can change course by demanding answers and better budgeting...

Continue reading on thefederalist