83.7 F
College Station
Tuesday, August 3, 2021

Abortion Businesses Target Pro-Life Activist in Lawsuit

Local News

College Station Bans Traditional Pet Shops

At Thursday's meeting, the College Station city council passed an ordinance that prohibits the sale of non-rescue dogs and cats in pet...

College Station to Vote on ROO in Special Meeting Today

The College Station City Council meets Monday at 4 p.m. at city hall to consider a Restricted Occupancy Overlay (ROO). The ordinance would allow single-family...

College Station Plans on Borrowing Additional $62 Million Without Taxpayer Vote

The College Station City Council voted to begin the process of issuing $62 million in certificates of obligations for capital projects. The...

Brazos Valley Hospitalizations Continue to Decline After Mask Order Rescinded

Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued Executive Order GA-34 on March 2, 2021, and the order went into effect on March 10, 2021....

Last week, a group of pro-abortion organizations filed a lawsuit to attempt to strike down Texas’ new heartbeat law, Senate Bill 8, which aims to ban abortions after a baby’s heartbeat is detected by allowing private citizens to sue abortionists.

But while the lawsuit is largely aimed at public officials acting in their official capacity—including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and the Texas Medical Board’s executive director, for example—there is one activist listed in the suit: Mark Lee Dickson.

Dickson, the director of Right to Life of East Texas, has been an instrumental player over the past two years for his work in helping make more than 30 cities in Texas “sanctuary cities for the unborn” by banning abortions within city limits. 

According to Texas Right to Life (a pro-life organization unaffiliated with Right to Life of East Texas):

Because of his tireless Pro-Life work and unapologetic stance for Life, Mark Lee Dickson has been singled out as a target by the abortion industry in the lawsuit to cripple SB 8. The lawsuit seeks to prohibit his specific involvement in enforcing the new law in any way. The abortion industry is suing him merely because Dickson has been public about his intent to ensure the abortion industry follows the new law and ordinances – and to assist other Pro-Life citizens in doing so as well. 

There is no sound legal reason for the abortion industry to name Dickson in this lawsuit. They have no standing to sue one individual Pro-Life Texan because the relief they seek will not remedy what they argue is their injury. If Dickson is enjoined from filing any lawsuits under SB 8, another private Texan could still do so, thus there is no legal reason to go after him. The real motivation behind targeting Dickson? Pure

Continue reading on Texas Scorecard

More articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

State News

Texas Should Stop Playing by the Left’s Rules – Episode 127

Last week, Governor Abbott—after being pressured by lawmakers, political opponents, and grassroots conservatives—took more action regarding the open Texas border. This action is...

With Priorities Stalled in House, Texas Senate Turns Attention to College Football

AUSTIN — Children across Texas still face genital mutilation, women’s sports are still threatened, families are still being taxed out of their homes, the...

Family of Austin’s Mass Shooting Victim Speaks Out Against Police Defunding

In mid-June, Austin’s harmful city decisions and alarming rise in homicides were driven home when gang warfare erupted in the city’s iconic Sixth Street...

State and Local Officials Pushing COVID–19 Vaccinations on Texans

State officials are using taxpayers’ money to pressure Texans into getting a COVID–19 vaccine. This, combined with documents revealing more about a Democrat-controlled county’s...

Special session ending, and no sign of Democrats returning

Special session ending, and no sign of Democrats returning The session started on July 8. But since July 12, House Democrats left...

Continue reading on Texas Scorecard